<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tw curricublog &#187; Standards &amp; Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/category/standards-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>weblog on matters of curriculum, maintained by Tony Whitson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wells&#8217;s Promiscuously Incorrect Guide as High-Stakes Test for science education</title>
		<link>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/15/promicuously-incorrect/</link>
		<comments>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/15/promicuously-incorrect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Whitson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards & Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/15/promicuously-incorrect/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Wells's Promiscuously Incorrect Guide give us a vehicle for considering, and improving, the quality of science education for the population of non-scientists?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/15/promicuously-incorrect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>wikis and/as textbooks</title>
		<link>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/12/wikis-textbooks/</link>
		<comments>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/12/wikis-textbooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Whitson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law & Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards & Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/12/wikis-textbooks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe all students would be better off if they could use wiki-style textbooks developed by, say, scientists and science teachers, or historians and history teachers, instead of the textbooks being marketed by commercial publishers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/12/wikis-textbooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>dilemma: hi-stakes history test ?</title>
		<link>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/03/hi-stakes-history-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/03/hi-stakes-history-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Whitson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BookTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards & Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/03/hi-stakes-history-testing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with the notion that history can or will really be taught if we have high-stakes testing for history.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonywhitson.edublogs.org/2006/09/03/hi-stakes-history-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
